The pesticide: ions chosen, # ions, absolute response, relative abundance concentration = absolute response matrix: solvent, commodity, sample preparation, matrix equivalent introduced analysis technique (GC or LC, ionization mode, single MS; MS/MS; QqQ, QTOF) instrument and acquisition parameters used.
- Mazzullo, M., Mesirca, R., Paolini, M., et. al., J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol., 1997, vol. 16, pp. 231–237.Google Scholar
- Farran, A., Serra, C., and Sepaniak, M.J., J. Chromatogr. A, 1999, vol. 835, pp. 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosales-Cornado, N., Leon-Gomzalez, M.E., Perez-Arribas, L.V., and Polo-Diez, L.M., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2002, vol. 470, pp. 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baim, M.A. and Hill, H.H., J. Chromatogr. A, 1983, vol. 179, pp. 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan, C.W., Anal. Chim. Acta, 1981, vol. 341, pp. 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wintersteiger, R., Goger, B., and Krautgartner, H., J. Chromatogr. A, 1999, vol. 846, pp. 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zakharenko, V.A., (Ed.), Gerbitsidy (Herbicides), 1990, Moscow: Agropromizdat.Google Scholar
- Klisenko, M.A., (Ed.), Metody opredeleniya mikrokolichestv pestitsidov (Methods for Determining the Trace Amounts of Pesticides), 1984, Moscow: Meditsina.Google Scholar
- Ochiai, N. and Sasamoto, K., Screening of pesticide residues in water by sequential stir bar sorptive extraction-thermal desorption with GC/MS, GERSTELK.K., 2-13-18 Nakane Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-0031 Japan.Google Scholar
- Khalaf, V.A., Turchin, V.O., Grin’ko, A.P., et al., Zhurn. Anal. Khimii, 2009, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 38–42.Google Scholar
- Khalaf, V.A., Turchin, V.O., and Zaitsev, V.N., Metody i Ob’ekty Khim. Analiza, 2009, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
- Khalaf, V.A., Zaitseva, G.N., Akekseev, S.A., et al., Ukr. Khim. Zhurn., 2005, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
- Metodicheskie ukazaniya po opredeleniyu 2,4-D v vode metodom VEZhKh (Methodical Guidelines for Determination of 2,4-D in Water by Using the HPLC Method), Approved by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, dated 29 July 1991, no. 6127–91.Google Scholar
- Lopez, O., Cocera, M., Pons, R., et al., Langmuir, 1999, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 4678–4681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Industrial News
Related stories
What Does Dark Chocolate Actually Smell Like? - Chromatography Sniffs It Out
Does Sun Cream Block Vitamin D? - Chromatography Explores
Is Spirulina a 'Superfood'? - Chromatography Investigates
Mar 31 2017Read 4930 Times
The use of pesticides on crops grown for food is a controversial topic. Farmers and food supply companies are keen to get the maximum yield from the land to keep production costs down and to maximise profits; whilst environmentalists are worried about the effect of too many pesticides on the environment and consumers are worried about the effect of too many pesticides on their health.
In a battle that will have many twists and turns — especially if the UK relaxes the rules on pesticide use post-Brexit — it is up to chromatography to provide the data on the nasties that might be lurking on our plate. But which method is best for measuring the pesticides in our food?
Pesticides — a deeper look
Pesticides get rid of pests. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines pesticides as ‘any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest’. This includes insects, weeds or unwanted plants and fungi.
The EPA uses four classes of chemical pesticides:
- Organophosphorus pesticides work by disrupting the neurotransmitter enzyme acetylcholinesterase. They break down on exposure to air and sunlight.
- Organochlorine pesticides act by interfering with insect neurons.
- Carbamate pesticides are esters of carbamic acid. There are many different types and they have many uses including as fungicides, insecticides and herbicides. They are broken down in the environment within weeks.
- Pyrethroid pesticides are analogues of pyrethrin’s produced in flowers. They are widely used in insecticides.
The EPA has approved over 10,000 different types of pesticides using ‘conditional registration’ in the last decade — there are approximately 16,000 different pesticides known. Conditional registration is a fast track scheme on means that all the active ingredients might not have been fully tested for safety or environmental impact.
Chromatography analyses the residues
With so many potential pesticides in widespread use — multiresidue pesticide analysis is one of the main requirements in pesticide testing. And it seems that gas and liquid chromatography are both necessary for a complete picture along with tandem mass spectrometry in the ion transition mode.
Screening samples for so many possible ‘unknowns’ in a sample requires a comprehensive approach — particularly as the pesticides may have many different physiochemical properties. If the test is for a specific pesticide, then the task is much simpler and a search of a method database will show which method is recommended. The QuEChERS method was developed to help in the analysis of pesticides — and is now used in other types of analysis.
As consumers become more aware of what they are eating — the challenges for pesticide analysis will increase, a topic discussed in the article, Challenges Facing Pesticide Analysis and Monitoring - An Interview with Dr. Simone Hasenbein.